 |
อันนี้ รีวิวจาก Dpreview ครับ
Looking at what we've written above it's a little difficult to recommend the Fujifilm S2500HD on any grounds other than its low price. It's the cheapest camera in this test but in most areas it's also the worst performer. The camera is also only a very minor upgrade to its predecessor S2000HD (increased MP and a larger screen) and amongst this latest generation of superzooms it looks, with it 18x zoom and very basic video mode, a little unimpressive on the features front.
While you would expect a slightly more modest feature set from a camera that is targeted at the budget-conscious user, the inconsistent exposure and and other image quality issues are more serious. Like on the S2000HD the the automatic systems aren't reliable enough and require manual intervention more often than we would like. This makes the camera less suitable for the average Auto-mode user but even experienced snappers will find the erratic metering annoying at times.
The S2500HD is not a terrible camera but it's simply not on the same level as the competition in this test. Yes, it is the smallest camera in this test, but if compact dimensions are high up your priority list we would recommend having a look at the Panasonic FZ35 which in many ways is a much better camera in an only marginally larger package (and still at a acceptable price point).
| จากคุณ |
:
neo_nik 
|
| เขียนเมื่อ |
:
3 พ.ย. 53 13:39:22
|
|
|
|
|
((((((((FUJIFILM FINEPIX S2500HD))))))) เย็นนี้แล้วนะจะมีใครท้วงอะไรไรเปล่าคะ
