ความคิดเห็นที่ 39
ทางองค์การ Ravaille Research Center ได้รับคำร้องเรียนจากผู้ปกตรองดังนี้
On 21Nov07, a parent concerned about his/her two sons' consumption of Slusho posted on scienceforums.net asking about the legitemacy of a report written by the Ravaille Research Center that made claims about Seabed's Nectar. Both the post and report are below:
5Pancakes' post
Hi! I’m new to the boards. You all seem very well read so I hope someone nows what I’m talking about.
I'm attaching a article I found about the Slusho! drinks and the weird affect it's having on people. I'm worried because my 2 boys drink it everyday.
Does anyone have info on the Ravaille Research Center? Are they legitimate? Does anyone have any other research on Slusho! drinks?
Ravaille Research Center's report on Seabed's Nectar
1265.08.41 482
Vol.131, 476-491
Nectar (cont'd)
steady stream of print and media advertising, nutritional information concerning the
Slusho! drink remains limited, leaving some suspicious customers with a sour taste
in their mouths.
Last month, inadvertently coinciding with public pressure from the FDA regarding
plans to finally import Slusho! to the United States, my department at the Ravaille
Research Center released its own preliminary study on Slusho!'s mystery ingredient(s).
Despite slight food coloring changes to affect color, and, in the case of Chocolate
Rage, texture, our tests uncovered some surprisingly recognizable culprits.
Unfortunately, due to Slusho!'s peculiar response to traditional testing methods,
none of these ingredients could be definitely verified. We postulate the possible
presence of the following: Carbonated water, glucose, sodium citrate, vitamin E,
D-Pantothenol, citric acid, oleoresin, gelatine, sucrose acetate isobutyrate, phos-
phoric acid, carob bean gum, and potassium benzoate. True to their reputation, rep-
resentatives from Tagruato ignored our attempts at correspondence regarding [our/these]
findings, despite repeat phone calls, emails, and an ill-fated office visit.
None of these ingredients, on their own, send up any health-related warning [flag?].
Most are prevalent in any number of other publically available beverages. Except, of
course, for the glaring blue whale in the room: Seabed's Nectar ("kaitei no mitsu").
Slusho!'s self-proclaimed "special ingredient" and centerpiece of their prolific adver-
tising campaign has somehow evaded classification in any kind of international di-
etary database. Unfortunately for the inquiring consumer, there's no law that requires
corporations to give all of the secrets of their recipes. Formulas for some of Slusho!'s
competitors have remained hidden for over a century.
Tagruato hides behind these legalities when faced with questions regarding their
acquisition methods and the chemical makeup of Seabed's Nectar, claiming the greed
'' of rival companies has forced their silence. Tagruato's successful evasion of both gov-
ernment and private research, however, may be costing a higher price for consumers
than they realize. Assuming, despite public disagreement on the subject, that Seabed's
Nectar does have the restorative powers that Tagruato claims in their campaigns, or-
ganized research into the ingredient could lead to growth in preventative and homeo-
pathic medicine. Their choice to hide what could be a great benefit to the collective
knowledge of mankind seems both unethical and disgustingly profit-oriented.
Concerned about the wealth of knowledge lost by Tagruato's negligent attitude,
my department managed to obtain a small sample of Seabed's Nectar. Our conclu-
sions are spotty at best, based on diluted specimens and poor investigative condi-
tions. Our findings are too consistent, however, to be discounted completely. [The/Any/Upon]
short term exposure to the substance, some initial tests revealed accelerated cell
growth, increased strength, increased soft muscle tissue growth, sharper eyesight
better digestion, smoother skin, and a full-body, pleasant sensation that one of our
researchers actually described as "a wave of pure happiness". The rest of this paper
will attempt to summarize our findings based on preliminary test with Seabed's
Nectar and, hopefully, lay the foundation for more extensive research. We [???ed]
our testing regimen with a current case study: the notorious documentary footage
depicting an 84-year-old woman drinking twelve large Slusho! beverages and l[???]
จากคุณ :
porjai_j 
- [
23 ม.ค. 51 19:56:42
]
|
|
|
