|
ความคิดเห็นที่ 75 |
|
#72
My example may be too bad. I'm sorry but I don't mean that "pregnancy = tarnished". (but I think woman who killed her own child by abortion with bad reason was unacceptable.)
Pregnancy is not a problem. the reasons that she get pregnant may be not a problem too.
If she had sex with her former lover that mean she loved him in the past so it's no problem. It's what many lovers do.
If she forced to get pregnant against her will (ex: being raped etc.), the man who can blame her is just a bastard, break up with him may be better choice. (= =")
I just wondered if "someone who can't accept some bad point (in his(or her) view) of the lover but he(or she) want a lover to accept his(or her) irreversible past." have the right to say "The one who can't accept another past is just a worthless guys" or not?
*Irreversible past doesn't mean only \pregnancy. It include someone who have been imprisoned, someone who used to addicted to drugs etc.
**from my previous example (#71), getting pregnant doesn't mean becoming tarnished and some hobbies that won't cause problem to another persons aren't bad things too.
please don't have liver's pain because of my grammar ^^"
จากคุณ |
:
Fifth of the Nine Bringers
|
เขียนเมื่อ |
:
วันเกิด PANTIP.COM 08:46:16
A:110.164.91.133 X: TicketID:236760
|
|
|
|
|