ความคิดเห็นที่ 19
Sorry for typing in English today. I am out of town. For my opinion I still think that telling about the risk is necessary. Vet Surasak did not tell about what may happen due to my dog age and species, how can he use this to explain about the cause of death? It does not make any sense. I understand thing can go two ways. But at least let me first, so I can decide I should do or not. Vet Surasak decided not to tell me about the risk. I dont care about his reason (maybe good or bad). But when it came out like this, why cant I blame him? I see somebody talk about money. For me I think you should charge what you think it is enough. If you think it need more than one vet, or more examine, just tell us how much it will cover. If you want to keep customer by charging lower price, can you be responsible for thing like this? Dont forget you work with life. You can not buy it back when you already screw up. Still missing you, Sprite. Love
จากคุณ :
spy
- [
24 ต.ค. 49 20:41:02
]
|
|
|