 |
#16
ที่มาของค่าปรับตามนี้เลยครับ กรณีนี้ลูกขุนให้ผิดเต็มๆฐาน willful copyright infringement
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1577369.html
At the end of the trial, the District Court charged the jury to determine whether Kirtsaeng had infringed the copyrights of each of eight works and whether any such infringements had been willful. The District Court explained that, under the statutory damages scheme found at 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), see note 10, ante, if the jury found that Kirtsaeng had infringed Wiley's copyright, it could award no less than $750 and no more than $30,000 in damages for each infringed work.
The District Court identified two exceptions to this rule. First, the District Court instructed the jury that, if it found that Wiley had proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the infringement was willful, under the statutory scheme the jury had the option of awarding up to $150,000 in damages per infringed work. Second, if the jury found that Kirtsaeng had proved by a preponderance of the evidence “that he was not aware and had no reason to believe that his acts constituted an infringement of copyright,” the jury could choose to impose an award of statutory damages as low as $200 per infringed work. The jury ultimately found Kirtsaeng liable for willful copyright infringement of all eight works and imposed damages of $75,000 for each of the eight works.
| จากคุณ |
:
3MOG  
|
| เขียนเมื่อ |
:
18 เม.ย. 55 17:02:42
|
|
|
|
|
ศาลสูงสุดสหรัฐฯ พิจารณา นศ.ไทย ขายตำราเรียนผ่านอีเบย์
