ความคิดเห็นที่ 29
Are there any proper evaluations of Thaksin's policies? Without it, I think it is hard to say anything much whether the policies succeed or fail. For example, the หมู่บ้านละล้าน policy, TRT says that it is successful because people pay back money. But Prachatipud says that it fails because people simply borrow money to repay loan. Who is right? What is the proportion of people who do like Prachatipud's suggestion, and what is the percentage of successful villages? Also, howz other indicators of success doing (inequality, correction of market failure, will this policy happen anyway without Thaksin -- maybe it've been done already but without much "marketing" etc.)?
Hard to judge w/o proper economic evaluation.
จากคุณ :
..
- [
16 ม.ค. 48 18:36:58
A:81.86.81.42 X: TicketID:083442
]
|
|
|