 |
ความคิดเห็นที่ 3 |
Background is normally placed at the end of the story.
The organisation of news writing is different from essay writing is that the most important part is placed at the first paragraph because it is well-known that some readers don't have much time. They want to get to the point immediately. For this reason, the title and the first paragraph must summarise the whole story. The rest is the supporting details, ending with the background of the story which is usually placed last [see BOLD FACE]
http://www.bangkokpost.com/breakingnews/186895/world-energy-path-unsustainable
World's energy path 'unsustainable'
Published: 19/07/2010 at 11:59 PM
Online news: Breakingnews
AFP -- Major economies looked Monday at how to cooperate in shifting to cleaner sources of energy, with a top policy board warning the world's current path was unsustainable.
Senior officials from economies making up 80 percent of global Gross Domestic Product opened two days of talks in Washington in a US initiative to find common ground amid torturous negotiations on a new climate change treaty.
The meeting comes as the United States tries to end the worst oil disaster in its history, a three-month-long spill from a BP well in the Gulf of Mexico.
"Without major changes to the way we produce and in energy use, we will confront untenable risks to our collective energy security and to the environment in the future,'' Nobuo Tanaka, executive director of the International Energy Agency (IEA), told the delegates.
"Indeed, the Deepwater Horizon accident in the Gulf of Mexico is a tragic reminder of this,'' he said.
The IEA, which advises advanced economies, said in a recent study that without a shift from fossil fuels, energy-related carbon dioxide emissions _ which are blamed for global warming _ would nearly double by 2050.
The IEA said that, even leaving aside environmental benefits, a decision to make more than half of light vehicles eco-friendly by 2050 would save global consumers 112 trillion dollars _ although the costs of adjustment would be 46 trillion dollars.
"We still have formidable challenges before us, but each day we wait, the challenge becomes harder. Every year of delay adds 500 billion US dollars to the cost of action,'' Tanaka said.
Delegates said the two-day meeting was likely to make announcements on joint initiatives, although it was unclear how specific they would be.
One area of discussions will be on how to develop a cleaner form of coal, which makes up more than a quarter of the global energy supply and is politically sensitive in the United States and China, the top two polluters.
"The goal here is not to discuss what one might agree upon,'' said US Energy Secretary Steven Chu, the meeting's host. "Our goal here today is to take concrete actions.''
Chu put a priority on international standards on energy efficiency. He noted that US refrigerators, one of the largest guzzlers of electricity, have grown in efficiency but also in size, undercutting the benefits.
He also encouraged countries to adopt a plan of painting roofs white, decreasing the amount of energy that buildings need for electricity.
The clean energy meeting, which Chu expected to be the first of several, is an offshoot of the US-led Major Economies Forum, which brings key nations together to seek progress on fighting climate change.
Negotiations on a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, whose requirements for nations to cut emissions run out at the end of 2012, have been hamstrung by disputes over how much to demand of developed and emerging economies.
The countries taking part in the talks are Australia, Brazil, Britain, Canada, China, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Norway, Russia, South Korea, Spain, South Africa, Sweden, the United Arab Emirates and the United States.
The European Union is also participating, along with a number of international organizations.
| จากคุณ |
:
K.Senior  
|
| เขียนเมื่อ |
:
20 ก.ค. 53 02:25:49
|
|
|
|
|
