ตรวจภาษาอังกฤษ proposal

ผมต้องส่งproposal ให้อาจารย์ที่ปรึกษา พอดีผมอ่านๆดูแล้วรู้สึกว่าภาษายังไม่สละสลวย เลยอยากขอความเห็นว่าควรแก้ไขตรงไหนบ้างครับ ข้อความผมจะโพสท์ข้างล่างนะครับ ยาวหน่อยเพราะเป็นทั้งหน้าที่เขียน
The Modern conservation movement has been developed constantly since late eighteen century till present. It started from the restoration movement in the nineteenth century to the preservation of authenticity and integrity of single monument/historic building and tangible heritage, codified in the Venice Charta (1964). Since that time the idea has been boarder by shifting an approach to concern historic context, group of historic edifices, and site. With these concerns has narrowed a distinguishing between conserved building and developed environment. Hence, the social problems of community which existed through heritage sites have still remained. At present, the integrated conservation approach which combined between conservation approach and local participation is promoted to be a solution of social conflict problem between local needs and conservation approach.

Particularly, in the conservation areas which have been called ‘Living Heritage Sites ’or other hands, an traditional community or district in the context of historical settlement which is still inhabited and also live and use historic edifices in daily life.

Nevertheless, the lopsided decision which causes to solve only one side of the problems could have an influence on the wrong direction in terms of planning and development. Owing to the development of conservation practices which have been emphasized in materialized and also focus on top-down/conventional approach. Most of conservation sites have adopted conservation frame and planning from central authorities starting from national to international level. These groups of authorities can be represented as conservational expertise groups who dedicate to preserve integrity and authenticity of physical elements of heritage areas. It can argue that most of expertslack of long-term life experience in their study areas. Consequently, this problem has brought to the decision-making in conservation planning which often neglects actual needs of local people who are long-term custodians of sites.

Regarding to preliminary problems in Living heritage sites, it can be clarified that the cause of problems came from conservation perspective which accentuates only to conservation aspect. This approach has definitely resulting in the neglect of development aspect and unresponsive to socio-economic needs of community. Including several urban phenomena, for instance, ‘gentrification’ which is initiated from decreasing of local residents and emigration of affluent people/investors into heritage sites. Regarding to the lack of social, cultural, and traditional background of new settlers, the result of such phenomenon can certainly cause the loss of local socio-cultural in heritage sites. Other phenomenon, such as aging-society when socio-economic in communities cannot satisfy the need of career-paths in young generation. It caused the labor forces mobility to big cities and leave elderly staying in their old community.

These kinds of problems have regularly exited in many conservation communities especially in Southeast Asia which since in the past twentieth years there were many efforts to adapt western conservation frame idea (so called ‘conventional conservation approach’) to local conservation practices. Recently, the idea of integrated conservation has emerged. It tries to integrate between local participation approach and conservation process which could be called as ‘bottom-up/community-based approach’. It has been believed that this idea can lead to the actual sustainable conservation. Nevertheless, in several local conditions, the process of local involvement has been ceased at implementation process. There are several documents indicating this kind of method has spent number of time in debating, arguing and producing inconclusive documents. As a result, a huge number of conservation sites turning back to apply the conventional conservation approach which is more pragmatic and gather concrete results more abruptly.

จากคุณ	: ขอแรงหน่อยครับ
เขียนเมื่อ	: 24 พ.ย. 53 19:36:32 A:141.54.152.6 X: TicketID:100676