นิตยสาร TIME ฉบับวันที่ 20 March 2006
ลงบทความยาวเรื่องการเมืองไทย Should Thaksin Stay?
และมีบทสัมภาษณ์บุคคลต่างๆ อาทิ
พลตรีจำลอง
กรณ์ จาติกวณิช
หมอสุรพงษ์
ดร.ฉลองภพ ทีดีอาร์ไอ
ฯลฯ
แต่ที่น่าสนใจคือ คำสัมภาษณ์ ปราบดา หยุ่น
I don't like Thaksin and agree that he should resign. But now it's become conplicated because I don't like his rivals.
Each side has its own agenda. If Thaksin steps down, everything will be more relaxed. But he's so stubborn and self-righteous that he's probably not going to step down. It's getting tiresome.
In Bangkok people are divided into three groups. The first is anti-Thaksin, the second supports the government, and the third consists of people who are just bored and fed up with the situation and want it to go away.
I dont't approve of the government and the way it's running the country. But it's also difficult to support or agree with the street protesters. The issues they raise against the government aren't credible. They're just trying to get people angry and win support. It's not really democracy at all on the streets. They're not really offering a solution or saying what could be done better. They are just trying to get Thaksin out.
Before this crisis, very few people were openly antigovernment. Now many are, because they think they should be. Lots of people are taking sides, not really knowing what it's about, or how to actually solve anything.
Some people go the rallies to be "part of history", or to meet friends, take photos. It's become theater.
แก้ไขเมื่อ 20 มี.ค. 49 17:55:23
จากคุณ :
จิ๋ม นางเลิ้ง 
- [
20 มี.ค. 49 17:53:16
]
คำสัมภาษณ์ ปราบดา หยุ่น ในนิตยสาร TIME (20 mar 06) เรื่องสถานการณ์การเมืองไทย
